We strongly dispute the accuracy and fairness of this review.
Firstly, the reviewer was not the purchaser of the vehicle. This review has been written by a third party, and as such does not represent a first-hand customer experience.
The vehicle was returned by agreement and never did we “fob anyone off”. We have written evidence showing that bank details were requested multiple times before any refund could be processed. We suggest the reviewer confirms this directly with the purchaser, as we retain full communication records.
No member of staff behaved nervously or unprofessionally, and that allegation is entirely untrue.
The refund amount reflected the vehicle’s use and agreed deductions. This was explained at the time and accepted. The suggestion that money was withheld dishonestly is false.
We also categorically deny that calls or messages were ignored. In fact, a mobile mechanic attended very late at night in an effort to assist, something entirely inconsistent with the claim that we were unhelpful.
Regarding the V5C, this was intentionally not submitted, as we operate a standard grace period before registering a new keeper. This protects customers from unnecessary additional ownership records should a vehicle be returned, which, in this case, proved entirely appropriate.
Finally, re listing the vehicle for sale with an updated description following full inspection and resolution is standard industry practice. Our business description is 'car sales'.
We welcome genuine reviews from actual purchasers, but we do not accept reviews containing exaggerated, misleading, or factually incorrect statements written by third parties. We reserve the right to challenge reviews that misrepresent events.