Child welfare.
My experience with Laura Sellick at Almy & Thomas was extremely disappointing.
During a family court hearing, I raised genuine safeguarding concerns about my child being expected to sleep in a room without a window, ventilation, or natural light. Rather than addressing these concerns professionally, Ms Sellick dismissed and belittled them in court, stating that a child “does not need a window” in a bedroom.
I found this attitude concerning, particularly in a case involving a young child’s welfare and safety. Subsequent checks showed that my concerns about the room were valid, which makes the way they were handled even more troubling.
In my experience, the approach taken was intimidating and lacked sensitivity towards child welfare issues. I did not feel that my concerns as a parent were treated with the seriousness they deserved.
Based on my experience, I would not recommend this firm for matters involving child arrangements where safeguarding and welfare should be paramount.








