While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

See what reviewers are saying

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

its a scam company located in india , they have no right no background they do this for money , if someone hates you he contact them and they take down your account

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This is a fake company who doesn't utilize moralistic thinking. Strangely, for a copyright enforcement company, they do not seem to have any understanding as what counts as a fair use case. I am hopin... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Complete Scum, one of the biggest scam factories on the internet and the lowest of human scum. And of course they're indian, who figures. This so called 'company' should be raided and everyone wor... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Horrible company. Fraudulent and counterfeit company assuming that they deal with copyright takedowns but all they do is commit to false copyright strikes without being affiliated with any of the grou... See more

1.4

Bad

TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

32 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Extremely unprofessional

This company keeps spamming fake DMCA reports to hosting providers without taking any responsibility for their claims, no communication with their counterparties either. Absolutely shameful and pathetic business.

1 May 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

MarkScan fraudsters sending invalidated DMCA every month, it's getting ridiculous...

Sending every month an fraudulent DMCA take-down request to my provider, who isn't even hosting that which they claim it to be (figures..). Thank god my provider checked and verified that MarkScan is indeed sending fraudulent DMCA's. Sadly, they have to handle DMCA's cause they have also American clients, so it's kind of cringe, but it is what it is.
MarkScan has been emailed about this, and told to stop their invalid DMCA requests, but they never respond, so in my opinion they have violated the DMCA requirements for communication. They should be blacklisted from sending ANY DMCA whatsoever, cause not communicating with people they argue they are infringing, is just showing they don't care about sending falsified requests for take-down, and could harm a lot of sites in the process for wrong reasons.

21 February 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This company misuses ISPs abuse forms

This company misuses ISPs abuse form and makes autoamted requests to take websites and content offline, based on their automated half-baked software that is unable to properly identify content.

Also, their positive google maps reviews are obviously fake.

12 January 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Markscan - Fix your "proprietary automated tool"

Markscan is an Indian IP protection company that boasts on their website (markscan.co.in & markscan.in)...

========================================
"our competence in process and system design has resulted in us exceeding client expectations time and again."
========================================

But they do not meet my expectation of a competent company, so I DO NOT recommend them.

Why?

Because their inept, patent-pending automated software & systems regularly send my hosts DMCA take-down notices for content that does not exist (in some cases, has not existed for years) & was nothing to do with me.

All I ask, is that they take the time to visit the URL they are claiming to infringe their clients' copyright, BEFORE sending the DMCA take-down notice, to verify their claim. Then they will see how hopeless their automated tool is.

I shouldn't need to ask, though. In each email they send, they declare...

========================================
"The information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. We hereby declare that the information in the notification is accurate to the best of our knowledge & belief."
========================================

!!!"The information in the notification is accurate"!!!!

This is what the author claims "under penalty of perjury"

What a joke! It isn't accurate. It is a waste of their time, my time, my hosts' time, the search engines' time & their client's money.

Markscan, please, get your act together & do your research properly, then double-check it BEFORE you fire off the harassing emails - that is what I would call "competence".

2 March 2021
Unprompted review
Show reviews in all languages. (32 reviews)

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look