FunderPro 

Funderpro has been professional and responsive as I am learning their success system. Appreciate their entire team. Thankyou

Banned something like 2 months ago for hedging - ip sharing and other excuses to not pay. Now is time to write what I think about this big scam society.
The thing is simple, their model business is not sustainable, when their cashflow goes negative, they start to deny payout, delay everithing and randomly banning people. I am not the only one, I have a few friends that had the same problem with funder pro. People spend money and time to pass their challenge and with a click, they ban you, taking also your time that is worth more than every dollar. Stay away from this prop firm, their model business is a completely total scam.

Literally funderpro is doing scam with trader i didn't expect from this firm funderpro please improve your payout rejection many people giving reply funder pro reject my payout unnecessary reason you are giving to traders why we are not giving negative review to other firm if you really doing wrong with trader then they will give negative review to your firm

I received a single warning email out of 167 trades stating I was slightly over margin (.51). The rule is to stay under 20% margin per trade, and at the time I opened the trade, my margin usage was under 20%.

We were close to payout (I requested a payout), but when I woke up my account was closed. I never received any prior warning—only that one warning email, and it stated my account could be closed if it happened again. 2 minutes later, my account was closed.

After I escalated the issue, support said I was over-leveraged and wrote: “Once these overleveraged profits were deducted, the account equity fell below the allowed drawdown limit, which resulted in the account being marked as failed.” They stated that my overleveraged profits totaled $7,952.37.

However, besides the numbers not adding up, this does not make logical sense. Any trades that were anywhere near the 20% margin limit were already closed before I opened the new trade, so there should not have been overleveraged profits to deduct. After simple checks and balances my actual profits were nowhere near $7,952.37.

To add. Prior to this, I spoke to support and they said to trade under 20%. Which I followed in a strict manner.

This is very confusing, and I do not understand how my account could be closed under these circumstances, especially right before payout. Support did not clearly explain the calculations or show where the violation occurred. Very disappointing.

I hope my next review is stating that they provided a logical response and fixed my concerns. But as I read back at other reviews, I see my review is an ongoing trend.

This profirm is z most scam in z world..even in step 1 they will scam u with clear false accusations...they told me that I breached z consistency rule 2x despite ther is no evidence...so I am 100% sure that I will not get payouts and also every 1!!

I passed a challenge. They paid me the first time. They changed the terms unilaterally (12/19) rather than paying me the second time I earned and requested payment (12/18). I have tried multiple times to contact them about this. They haven't told me that I breached their rules with the account. The payment request is still "in review" on 2/15. They are just not responding to my emails. When I tried to use support, they had my email (they were able to send a transcript of the chat to my email), but the support guy "closed my ticket because he didn't have my email". They are all excuses rather than honoring their payments reliably. Why do business with people who don't pay reliably? Avoid these people. Keep your money.

Warning. Do not use this unscrupulous prop firm! They do not realize it but what they sent me as a reason for not paying me and shutting off access to my dashboard with absolutely no prior issues is an admission of their own guilt and that they only profit from our loss and will gladly accept our money as long as we are failing challenges. If we are a profitable trader, that manages risk exceptionally well, and receives payouts consistently, they do not want that on their platform.

"Dear James,

Following a compliance and risk-model review of your account 1739507, we identified trading behavior that results in asymmetrical profitability inconsistent with FunderPro’s risk framework.

In simple terms:

This means profits were generated through a setup where potential losses were artificially constrained or shifted, preventing the Company from participating in the balanced risk-reward exposure that exists in real-market trading conditions.

Practically, this can include scenarios such as:

Structuring trades so that downside exposure is limited beyond what real market mechanics would allow
Using execution or risk configurations that protect gains while transferring loss potential to the Company
Repeatedly benefiting from conditions where profitability is achieved without proportional market risk
Findings

While trading risk is an inherent part of our model, it must remain economically viable for both parties. The activity identified on your account reflects a structural imbalance, where trader profitability is achieved while downside risk is disproportionately borne by the Company.

Such behavior falls under prohibited practices as outlined in Clauses 13.6, 13.14, and 13.15, including:

Risk structures that disadvantage the Company
Exploitation of artificial constraints not present in real market environments
Trading behavior driven by structural exploitation rather than transferable trading skill
FunderPro’s programs are designed to identify traders whose profitability can coexist sustainably with the firm’s risk model. Activity that structurally disadvantages the Company is not permitted."

It is all a bunch of garbled hogwash and those dogs just don't hunt. Every time I receive a payout, they get a percentage of my profits if they are using real money in a funded account scenario. We both share in the same risks and rewards.

Risk management is by definition "constraining losses". If they are taking a cut of profits, why would they want poor risk management? Because it means for them MORE FAILED CHALLENGES AND MORE PROFITS for FUNDER PRO. Run for the hills and do not engage with them.

I had a very disappointing experience with FunderPro regarding my funded account

My reward was denied due to alleged “unauthorized IP usage.” I immediately responded, explained that I am the sole trader on the account, and provided detailed context. I also submitted supporting travel documents when requested.

After further requests from their Risk Team, I provided full VPS documentation, including:

VPS invoice and service period

Static IP address

Server location

Provider dashboard screenshots as required

Since submitting all requested documentation, communication has significantly slowed, and I have not received any updates despite multiple follow-ups already. It has now been an extended period without response.

I fully understand the need for compliance checks, but the lack of timely communication and transparency throughout this process has been frustrating and unprofessional.

Despite fully cooperating and providing everything requested, communication has effectively stopped. Multiple follow-up emails have gone unanswered for an extended period.

The lack of timely communication, transparency, and resolution after submitting full documentation unfair. It is extremely frustrating to have a reward denied, receive no meaningful updates, and no clear path toward resolution or refund.

Sad to see another prop firm going down.

I'm updating this review from 1 star to 4.
Their system detected a problem with kyc and I got banned and my payout got denied. I previously gave one star because I got no reply after asking for explation. But then it took over one month but in the end they admitted their mistake, unbanned me, reinstated my account and disbursed my payout. I wish the process could have gone a little faster but I'm happy that they recognised it was an error on their side in the end. I still think they could speed up the time in payouts and procedures in general but after this they have gained my trust back anyway

I have purchased 50k classic account I have cleared all challenge and got my funded account as after reaching on payout day I have requested my payout which 4879$ after 80% split they rejected my payout and suspended my account by saying that I have overleveraged but I only traded under 20% margin rule never touched daily drawdown limit they just assumed and gave me this reason

Unfortunately Funderpro has turned into a scamming company. I gave them 5 stars last year in October. So basically I bought a 100K daily rewards account, passed it in 10 days and got the funded account on 11th day. I took 2 trades, made 1% and closed the system. I requested my payout and 4 hours later they denied my payout and terminated my account saying I breached some IP address policy which I obviously didn’t do, I even provided with proof but they ignored it. This was daylight robbery by this company, so please don’t waste your hard earned money on them. It’s only a matter of time that they will shut down.

I'm giving them two stars because this company used to be legitimate and I received good payouts, but now the company is a failure and I wouldn't recommend anyone buy a challenge here. Why? I bought an instant funding challenge, followed all the rules as stated, and traded for about 20 days. For every trade, I used a stop loss and maintained a 15% consistency. Sometimes I moved my stop loss, but I always traded according to all the company's rules. Therefore, I requested my payout of $4500, and they emailed me saying they were breaking the rules. I closed my account; it's such a waste of time. You can't trade here however you want, even if you follow the rules; it's shameful. You can't trust this company anymore; it's become just like all the others. Account 1741894

I completed FunderPro’s Classic Challenge and was issued a funded account. After generating profit, I submitted a payout request. FunderPro then initiated a compliance review related to my trading IP address and paused the payout.

I provided documentation showing that I traded from a dedicated Hyonix VPS registered in my name, including:
• The VPS invoice in my name
• The dedicated IP address assigned to me
• Confirmation that the VPS was not shared
• Confirmation that I did not access the account from any other network or device

FunderPro acknowledged that VPS usage is permitted under their rules and accepted my documentation before their stated deadline. The case was escalated to a senior risk analyst for review.

After the secondary review, FunderPro informed me that their initial finding was upheld. They stated that the IP address associated with my VPS had been “shared or reused in a manner inconsistent with single-user operation,” and concluded this constituted a breach of Section 13.4 of their Terms and Conditions. As a result, my funded account was closed and my payout was denied.

FunderPro did not provide me with timestamps, access logs, or external evidence showing actual account sharing or third-party trading. The decision relied on their internal analysis of IP data rather than the documentation I submitted.

Prospective traders should be aware that even when using a dedicated VPS and providing supporting evidence, payouts may still be denied based on internal IP assessments that are not fully disclosed to the trader.

I am writing this review to document my experience factually and transparently.

I traded with FunderPro for an extended period and purchased multiple $100,000 challenges under the same registered email. I was funded more than once in the past, including a funded account where payouts were successfully processed earlier.

Recently, I passed another $100,000 challenge and received a funded account (Account ID: 22233106). After funding:

I placed one single manual trade on gold

Lot size: 1.0

Stop loss applied at entry

Trade fully within all published risk and margin rules

Resulted in approximately $3,050 profit

After this trade, I stopped trading and requested a payout as per the rules.

The next day, my dashboard access was revoked, the funded account was permanently closed, and all associated active challenges were blocked.

The reason given was “Asymmetrical Profitability / Loss Shifting.”

However:

No specific trade rule violation was identified

No automation, hedging, latency abuse, or manipulation was used

The decision appears to be based on historical net profitability to the firm across previous accounts, not on the funded account’s actual trading behavior

Additionally:

I was asked to “log in and provide screenshots” despite my dashboard access being revoked

My paid, active challenges were blocked with no refund or access

Repeated requests for a human compliance review resulted in automated or generic responses

I fully accept losses when accounts breach rules — that is part of trading.
What is concerning here is a profitable funded account payout being denied retroactively, based on cumulative firm profitability rather than a clear rule breach on the account in question.

I am still requesting:

A human compliance review of the funded account using backend trade data, or

A clear identification of the exact trade action that violated rules, or

A refund for unused and blocked paid challenges

Posting this publicly in hopes of transparency and proper escalation.

My payout was denied after FunderPro claimed my account showed “shared or coordinated access.” I strongly disagree with this conclusion.
I traded independently and never shared my account credentials with anyone. The reason given was IP and login similarity with other traders, which is not sufficient evidence on its own—especially when factors like travel, dynamic IP addresses, mobile networks, or ISP routing can easily cause such overlaps.
What’s disappointing is the lack of transparency. No detailed timestamps, IP logs, or concrete behavioral proof were shared—just a generic explanation and reference to internal systems. For a serious allegation that leads to payout denial and suspension, traders deserve clearer data and proper justification.
I have submitted an appeal and provided supporting documents. Until that review is completed, I cannot recommend this firm to other traders.
Prop firms must maintain strict rules, but enforcement should be fair, transparent, and evidence-based—not purely algorithm-driven.

Great company! I’ve received multiple payouts with funderpro. Been trading with them for about 8 months now.

Only thing I don’t like is the 20% margin rule. Only because it makes it impossible to trade cryptos like bitcoin which is a pair I regularly trade but are unable to because of that rule.

Other than that. I’ve had no issues with them. I follow their rules so I’ve had all my payouts approved. Most of my payouts are processed in a day. Only had 1 that took 4 days. Most likely because I requested it on a Friday.

FunderPro basically traps traders with their minimum trading day rule. You either pay extra money upfront to remove the minimum trading day requirement, or if you perform well and meet the profit target early, they can and will deny you funding later by calling your trading “inconsistent.” It feels like a system where they win no matter what.

This was my third attempt with them. I passed 200k Phase 1 with disciplined risk management, averaging about 1.1% loss and 5.5% profit over 6 trading days. In Phase 2, I had just one losing trade of about 0.6%, and all the other trades were winners. I met the profit target within 3 days.

Because their rules require a minimum number of trading days, I made a small trade on the 4th day just to meet that requirement. Instead of recognizing my overall performance and consistency, they ignored the entire trading history and focused only on that last small trade, calling it “inconsistent lot sizing” and denying funding.

Think about how ridiculous this is. If you finish the target early, you have to keep trading to meet a day requirement. But if you reduce risk on that last day, they can use it as an excuse to fail you anyway. So what are traders supposed to do? Risk more money unnecessarily just to satisfy their idea of “consistency”?

The worst part is that the rule itself is vague enough for them to interpret it however they want after you’ve already paid and completed the challenge. That is not transparency; that is moving the goalposts.

I’ve also seen many traders complaining about their false IP breach and multiple device allegations, so this isn’t an isolated case.

If you’re considering this firm, know that even if you follow risk management, meet targets, and trade responsibly, you can still be denied funding based on subjective interpretation. Personally, I strongly advise traders to think twice before spending money and time here.

I had an account with FunderPro that was closed following a compliance review.
From the beginning, I fully cooperated with their team and followed every instruction provided.
What I did:
• Opened multiple support tickets as requested
• Communicated calmly and respectfully at all times
• Waited patiently through long response delays
• Provided screenshots, device details, IMEI information, and proof related to my internet usage
• Confirmed clearly that no third party ever accessed or traded on my account
I never refused verification.
I never avoided review.
I never used copy trading or coordinated trading.
Their conclusion:
After weeks of communication, I was informed that my account was linked to other accounts via internal identifiers (MQIDs), but:
• No concrete evidence was shared
• No technical details were disclosed
• No appeal or arbitration process was offered
The decision was stated to be based on “strong suspicion”, and the case was marked closed.
Why this feels unfair:
I respect that prop firms must protect themselves and enforce rules.
However, closing an account permanently based on suspicion alone — without allowing a meaningful defense, evidence review, or neutral appeal — creates a serious imbalance.
I acted in good faith throughout this entire process.
I trusted the internal review instead of escalating publicly or involving third parties.
In the end, that trust was not reciprocated.
I am sharing this experience for transparency and so other traders can be aware of the risks. I hope it helps others make informed decisions.
•You can see the guide and all emails in a post in reddit Just write funderpro scammer

This company do scams with new traders by pointing useless elegations.

It's very bad 👎