AudaCity Capital  

THEY ARE FRAUDSTERS AND SCAMMERS- RUN, RUN, RUN, RUN FROM THEM.

AFTER PASSING A $200,000 PHASE ONE CHALLENGE, THEY CLOSED MY ACCOUNT.
THEIR RULE STATE THAT YOU MUST NOT OPEN A TRADE 3MINS BEFORE OR 3MINS AFTER NEWS. ALL THE TRADES THEY FLAGGED WERE OPENED FAR BEFORE THE NEWS AND CLOSED DURING THE NEWS AUTOMATICALLY(NO HUMAN INTERVENTION)- I WAS NOT EVEN ON THE PLATFORM WHEN THE TRADES CLOSED.

THEY WENT ON TO CLOSE THE ACCOUNT WITHOUT THE REFUND OF $902 PAID FOR THE CHALLENGE.

DON'T USE THEM - THEY ARE SCAMMERS

My Experience with Audacity Capital – Payout Rejected After Approval and Account termination Also.

I purchased a $25K Instant Funding account with Audacity Capital, successfully achieved the target, and generated a $1,500 payout, which was initially approved. My KYC had already been successfully verified.

When I requested the withdrawal, they asked me to correct the wallet address format. The wallet address provided was a valid address, and I simply entered it again according to their required format.

After that, they asked me to complete KYC again. I complied, but my KYC was then rejected due to an alleged PEP (Politically Exposed Person) match. As a result, my approved $1,500 payout was rejected/withheld, and my $50K account was also terminated.

I repeatedly asked Audacity Capital to provide evidence or clarification regarding the alleged PEP match—who I supposedly matched with and on what basis—but no specific evidence was provided. I was only told that the decision was final.

I understand and respect legitimate AML/KYC requirements, but my concern is the lack of transparency and due process, especially since my KYC had previously been verified and my payout had already been approved.

Very disappointing experience. I believe customers deserve a clear explanation and fair treatment when such serious compliance decisions are made.
Totally Scammers and cheaters
Be aware.
Given the false statement that I breached any trading rule.They just rejected the Payout and without any reason breached my account.

I had Audacity Capital on my shortlist because their challenge prices and account sizes looked competitive. Before purchasing anything, I started checking independent trader discussions and reviews.

Unfortunately, the number of concerns surrounding payout disputes was enough for me to reconsider.

As a trader, I’m willing to risk my challenge fee based on my own performance. What I’m not willing to risk is weeks of trading and effort with a firm I’m not confident will handle a successful payout fairly.

I decided to pass on Audacity Capital. There are too many alternatives to ignore concerns this serious

I recently came across a very concerning case involving Audacity Capital in our Russian-speaking prop trading community.

One of our traders shared his experience regarding a payout that was not honored, along with the reasons the company provided for refusing it. What makes this especially concerning is that at the same time, I constantly see Audacity Capital advertising on Instagram and Facebook and promoting claims about paying traders hundreds of thousands of dollars every month.

Seeing cases where a trader generates significant profit but then faces unclear reasons for a payout refusal raises serious questions for me about whether I would ever trust this company with my own money and time.

Our Russian-speaking trading community has around 24,000 members, and we take payout disputes with prop firms very seriously. Based on the case and documentation that was shared with our community, I personally would not purchase a challenge from Audacity Capital and cannot recommend them to other traders.

There are many prop firms to choose from. Think carefully before spending your money and months of your time on a challenge when there is a risk of facing serious problems at the payout stage

I first heard about the concerns surrounding Audacity Capital through discussions in our prop trading community. After reading what was shared and seeing the concerns traders raised about payout disputes, it definitely changed my view of the firm.

In prop trading, trust between the trader and the company is everything. You can spend weeks passing evaluations and building a funded account, so you need confidence in the firm behind it.

Based on what I’ve seen and read, Audacity Capital would not be my choice for a challenge. I would rather work with a firm that has earned stronger trust within the trading community.

Payout concerns changed my decision

I was genuinely considering Audacity Capital for my next prop challenge, but after researching the company and reading about several payout disputes, I decided not to proceed.

For me, payout reliability is more important than discounts, account sizes or marketing. If I have doubts about whether profits will be paid without a lengthy dispute, there is simply no reason to take that risk.

I’ll be choosing another prop firm.

Not worth the risk

I was considering buying an Audacity Capital challenge after seeing their ads, but after reading multiple complaints about payout issues and seeing a serious payout dispute shared in our trading community, I changed my mind.

For a prop trader, getting paid is the most important part. I’m not willing to risk my money and time with a firm where payout disputes are a recurring concern.

I’ll be choosing another prop firm.

Think twice before buying a challenge from Audacity Capital.

I personally had a terrible experience with Audacity Capital, and after seeing how they handled another trader from our community, I would not trust them with my money.

In my case, Audacity Capital breached my evaluation account for no valid reason due to what appeared to be a bug/error in their system. I contacted them immediately and spent two weeks communicating with their support team, providing evidence and screenshots showing what happened.

They told me they would investigate the issue.

I waited. I provided everything they asked for. And nothing was resolved.

They only got back to me after I initiated a chargeback.

Then I saw another situation involving a trader from our community who made around $47,000 on a funded account. Instead of receiving his payout, he went through a lengthy review process, had his account closed, and was given broad explanations regarding risk. In the end, the profit was not paid, and the company only offered to refund the challenge fee.

For traders, this is a serious problem.

If you can pay for a challenge, pass the evaluation, reach funded status, make significant profits, and still potentially lose those profits because of internal interpretations or issues on the firm’s side, what exactly are you paying for?

Based on my own experience and what I have seen happen to other traders, I would not recommend Audacity Capital to serious traders.

There are other firms with clearer rules, better communication, and a better track record of treating profitable traders fairly.

Don’t waste your time, effort, and money with them. Do your research before buying a challenge.

I thought they were different but disappointed when I requested for payment.

It is a pity I used to have regard for them.

I enjoy their monthly competitions, yet to get funded by them. However they have been in the industry for many years, which is a good sign of sustainability, I am slowly building trust which may result in a good partnership in the future.

I strongly recommend traders think carefully before investing their time and money with Audacity Capital.

I traded account #191405 and built the account to approximately $132,000. My trading was generally low-frequency XAUUSD trading, typically using only 0.12–0.25 lots, with many positions held for several hours and sometimes overnight.

When I requested my payout, Audacity Capital rejected it, terminated my account and permanently banned me from purchasing any future accounts.

They alleged two violations:

1. News Trading
2. Copy Trading / similarities with other accounts, including IP address

What concerns me most is not simply the payout rejection. A prop firm has every right to enforce clearly disclosed rules when a violation can be demonstrated.

My concern is the severity of the action — payout rejection + account termination + permanent ban — without providing me in their decision email with the specific trade IDs allegedly violating the news rule, the relevant news events and timestamps, or the specific accounts/trades allegedly demonstrating prohibited copy trading.

Regarding copy trading, they referred generally to similarities in timing, execution patterns, position sizing, entries and IP address. However, their email did not identify the other account or provide a trade-by-trade comparison.

If there is clear evidence that I violated a rule, I am willing to see it and accept responsibility for it. But when a firm takes the most severe possible action against a trader, I believe the trader deserves transparent and specific evidence explaining exactly what was violated.

Based on my personal experience, I cannot recommend Audacity Capital. I would rather invest my time and account fees with another prop firm where the rules, payout process and enforcement are sufficiently transparent.

I am posting this review to document my experience honestly so other traders can make their own decision.

If Audacity Capital provides detailed evidence demonstrating the alleged violations, I am willing to update this review accordingly.

I posted a 1-star review on August 21, 2026, regarding the banning of two of my funded accounts while I was awaiting a $405.15 payout—even though the payment had already been approved by the risk team. Audacity Capital subsequently contacted me to resolve the matter; they offered to refund the purchase fee for one of the two accounts if I removed the 1-star review. I refused. My core issue was the refusal to process the payout. They had previously banned me from their Discord support group when I raised the issue, yet now—after I posted the 1-star review—they reached out offering a $17 refund just to get me to delete it. I want to warn others: if you find yourself in a similar situation, do not waste time trying to negotiate in good faith with them. It yields no results and is simply a waste of time, effort, and trust.

Scammers. They have breached my account when I reached funded stage without giving any evidence of violation. Extremely disappointed. All things were good until funded stage. They are just looting people and I am sure, they have not processes even a single payout. Highly not recommend, Be Aware.

Scam. This prop firm is a scam: run run run away from them.

Keep your stopwatch close, because apparently trades lasting less than 2 minutes are not allowed — even if they account for less than 15% of your total trades.

I reached the required 10% profit target to qualify for a withdrawal, only to have my entire account breached based on a handful of trades that lasted less than 2 minutes.

So apparently, you can meet every performance target, make the required profit, and still lose your account because of a rule that has a disproportionate impact on your trading — even when those trades represent less than 15% of your total activity.

If a trade duration rule is this critical, it should be made absolutely clear before traders commit their money and time, not used afterwards to invalidate an otherwise successful account.

Lesson learned: with this firm, don't just watch the market — watch the stopwatch.

I was astonished that the company informed me that I breached the rules only when I requested a withdrawal. And the support team works poorly.

Simply don’t forget to check their rules, you won’t have any further desire to trade with them, especially if you’re a profitable trader with your own trading strategy.

Kind regards,
Leyla

Purchased over a year ago, trialled several strategies until I found "the one/ones". Passed challenge and verification without any issues. Managed to accrue 3% within first 14 days of live phase and I have been just emailed from the Risk management team that my payout has been approved. Very user friendly dashboard, customer team readily available over WhatsApp if you need any issues. I have purchased a 240k account which should go on soon. Overall, I am really pleased with AudaCity Capital and I will continue investing in their PropFirm.

I am part of the same professional trading community as Rasul and personally followed the situation with his Audacity Capital account. He traded a funded account, made around $47,000 in profit, and when it was time for the payout, Audacity Capital rejected it, closed the account, and explained the decision with broad “risk management” arguments. After long communication, they still did not pay the $47,000. Later, they offered another funded account with a much stricter 1% daily drawdown limit instead of the standard conditions, and even that account was later taken away over a claimed violation that, from what I saw, did not actually happen. For
professional traders, this is a major red flag. Trading is about making money, and if a profitable trader can be denied a payout after several good trades, then traders should think twice before risking their time and money there. In our Russian-speaking and CIS trading community, Audacity Capital is now considered a serious red flag. Based on what I saw, I personally would not buy an account with them and would not recommend them to other serious traders.

I successfully traded my account with Audacity Capital and submitted a legitimate payout request for my profits. Following the request, I was scheduled for a live risk interview. During the interview, I clearly and transparently explained my price action setup, trade execution, and risk management rules. All trades were executed solely by me on my personal devices.

However, shortly after the interview, I received a generic decision email from the Compliance and Risk Team (Ticket #170732) stating that my pending payout was withheld and my account was blacklisted due to alleged "concerns regarding authenticity and trading activity."

What is most concerning is that Audacity Capital provided zero concrete evidence or trading server logs to support these serious claims. Denying a legitimate payout request and terminating an account based on generic automated accusations—without showing any proof—is completely unfair and lacks transparency.

I am posting this review to request:

Full transparency and specific technical evidence regarding the alleged violations for Ticket #170732.

A fair manual re-evaluation of my raw execution data alongside my interview recording to release my earned payout.

Until Audacity Capital addresses this issue with real proof and fair treatment, I strongly advise other traders to exercise extreme caution when requesting payouts

Total fraud. They let me deposit easily but since I requested for payout it has been paid till date. Their support are so horrible, they don't respond. Avoid them immediately. I have switched to 777 mines and with them I have never encountered any problems or delays with my payouts.