Read First if Planning to Rent out your Property with Zest
We rented our property out for 18 months with Zest. It was let to a member of staff, although we weren't told they worked for Zest until their third viewing. This meant that the house was never properly put on the market. We were told that there was only one other viewer interested and they cancelled 30 mins before being due to visit, no explanation was given to us for this. Our agent persuaded us that the market was slow and that we needed to drop the price by £300. When we did this the Zest employee immediately came back and made an offer on the property. This was all very coincidental.
We felt that the whole experience was one of representing the employees needs and not ours.
- Once the offer was accepted we were immediately asked if we would rent for 18 months and not the agreed 12 months. We agreed this to show goodwill and flexibility but unfortunately this respect was not reciprocated.
- We were told that the family had 2 children and that every 2 weeks another 2 children, from a previous marriage, stayed for the weekend only. Yet when it came to the check out report it stated that the level of wear and tear was that expected from a family of this size. When I queried what size this was, the agent said that the report was referring to a family of 6. We did not know we were renting to a family of 6 and would not have knowingly chosen this.
- When the boiler broke down the agent immediately said we would have to forgo the next months rent to cover the cost of the family staying in a hotel, unless we paid for a new boiler straight away . To avoid loosing this rent we paid out £4,000 for a new boiler through Zest.
-We thought that going with a Zest employee would mean that we would at least be paid on time. However, one month our rent did not arrive on the set date and when I rang the accounts office (after my payment for groceries was declined) I was told I would have to wait a week as the tenants were having financial difficulties. They did not even have the curtesy to inform us in advance. When I objected I eventually received the payment mid week.
- We paid £245 for a Check In report and then another payment £180 for a Check Out report; we were told that without these we would not be able to claims for damages. These reports are an expensive waste of time. Where damage had been done to our house it was not photographed or even mentioned. This included a broken carousel kitchen cupboard, an oak work top with bad black staining and water marks. In the garden there were dead plants in all our outdoor pots of which 7 were mature and healthy olive trees, bay trees, roses and hydrangeas. Our tenants had reassured us that they were keen gardeners so the garden would be well looked after: no attempt had been made to do this.
- The agent came and looked at the damage with me and agreed to take £258 from the deposit to cover this damage. The tenants refused to pay this amount from their deposit.
-The agent recommended that we go through a despute process and agreed to finance our application to the Depute Resolution Service (DPS), Thank heavens we did not pay for this ourselves, because the report we received back made no attempt to address the particular damage we had raised. It concluded with comments such as:
"I am satisfied that the garden was returned in a comparably seasonal condition. " So please don't bother paying for any deputes to go to the DPS to cover damages.
-When it came to our return date we could not get the tenants to agree a date even though we had already extended it 6 months to help them out. In the end I had to contact the owner directly to say that our needs were just not being represented here and I wanted to return to my house. Finally a date was agreed 6 months and 3 weeks after the initial date. In fact the tenants still tried to change it but the owner of Zest intervened.
So be aware of what may be ahead of you. This tenant took advantage of our goodwill and flexibility and of being an employee. Zest paid no attention to our needs until I pointed this out to the owner of the company. Also note that the Check In and Check Out reports are expensive and ineffective for highlighting damage and the disputes process is just not worth pursuing.
19 November 2024
Unprompted review