Proof-Reading-Service.com Reviews 

The last two experiences I've had have not been good. After the English proofreading, I had to correct part of the text myself. Some examples: 1- healthy malignant patients with hematological malignancies (this does not exist!!); 2- Polymorphism analysis in DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B genes/ Analysis of the methylation profile in DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B genes (subtitles were not standardized); 3- unmethylated/ not methylated (the terms were not standardized) and other errors. The proofreader bothered to give an opinion on matters that do not concern him and forgot to do his job as an English proofreader. I inform you that if the journal to which I submitted the article requires an English review, I will request a free review from your team (which was already better).

The review was accordingly with the expectations.
RAther quick and professional.

The revision was not good, the reviewer criticized English quality of the manuscript. Grammar errors were introduced in the revision proccess. I submitted it to a different service and then the manuscript was approved.

Fast, serious, very good workers

Uncooperative and unhelpful behaviour of staff when queries are raised back after the proof-reading assignment is completed

Good service

Helpful and punctual, with good comments and suggestions also affordable price

They really took care of my book and helped me with the publication. They are professional, prompt and effective.

Sometimes the editing service is not so accurate. For instance, I noted that is moved forward by Indian editors rather than British or US native speakers. I don't have anything against the Indian people, but they usually speak Bengali or Nepalese to communicate with themselves, so English is not its native or mother tongue.

very satisfied with this first translation experience. The deadlines were met and the work was of high quality.

Your service is excellent and smooth.
Super easy, quick, reliable.

Good and fast review.

My experience with “Proof-Reading-Service.com” is as follows:
I assigned my work to be checked by a professional proofreader, chose “Journal Article Editing and Proofreading Services,” and sent some critical comments that were required by my journal, which included eliminating “passive voice” and “we.” at first place

Customer services removed all the comments and guidance that I sent and set my work on a basic “proofreading” service.
Anyway, I have received my work with many passive voices, used “we” many times, issues with consistent, and had issues with Commas.

The proofreader did a great job in the correction of spelling and grammar.

Do not trust these words"We guarantee 100% satisfaction"

Anyways, that was my experience with them; if you ask if I would refer them to friends or colleagues, I would say not really.

I'm an early career researcher, and I often ommit the small details due my lack of experience. However, after being introduced to this service, I submitted a conference paper and won the best paper of the conference. I have learned not underestimate this service as the team involved in the proofreading are thorough and dudiligant in what they do. Will definitely send all my future publications to this service before any manuscript submission. Thank you guys 😊

Great job. I approve of all of the correction as they did not change the meaning I intended.