Codeleap Reviews 

1
TrustScore 3 out of 5

3.2

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Company details


Contact info

3.2

Average

TrustScore 3 out of 5

1 review

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No recent history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited customers recently, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

3.2

All reviews

(1)

1 review in the last 12 months

Write a review

We perform checks on reviews

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Using Codeleap for Website development

I used Codeleap for a social/business app idea I had in 2020 whilst the company consisted of just Kamil (Ryszkowski) and Victor (Gimael). Over the course of 2020/21 the app was built and I was very impressed with facets like communication, quality of work, responsiveness, planning, documentation, etc. At the latter part of the Project Kamil left CodeLeap to presumably pursue other interests.

For context, the app work consisted of 66 development days, at a cost of just under £28,000. I then decided to build a website to complement the app, continuing to use Codeleap. The reasonable assumption would be that the website would take as long as the app to develop - in fact it should have been less as the bulk of the back end e.g. database schema, screens, etc had already been built. Unfortunately, this is where things started to go wrong, coincidentally with Kamil's departure imo a large factor.

I presumed (ignorantly) that Victor would use the app as a base for the website - the two were after all supposed to work together. For reasons unknown, and in hindsight and what I can only put down to a deliberate attempt to derive more development days, CodeLeap:

- built the website from scratch, instead of using the app's database model
- did not provide a beta website for 8 months despite several requests
- added unwanted (& non-working) features
- ignored four requests (two in person, two by email) to focus on specific items
-did not provide a basic plan or roadmap for 8 months
- did not log requests send by email/discussed in person.

There was not even standard follow-ups to meetings (that I had requested), to confirm what was to be worked on. Whilst I initially put this down to incompetence, in hindsight I believe this was deliberate, with no transparency on the work nor what I was paying for e.g. a designer designed a set of icons, (despite me providing them upfront), an unrequested nor required' title page', etc.

After 8 months I was finally presented with a 'beta' website - the quality was awful, with no working features, completely veered from what I had requested, and the app was rendered useless as it was not in sync with it's database model. I subsequently terminated the contract, and relayed to Victor the reasons for such.

We tried to discuss a solution going forward over my dissatisfaction over the Project (the web piece had cost £54,700 at 97 dev days) - during this discussion phase, whilst I acknowledge that the contract had ended, I considered the service very poor, with replies to emails coming a month or two later. Raising as to why the website was not compatible with the app was met with a shrug of the shoulders. I was subsequently offered partial corrective work at a 50% discount, and then for nothing after I mentioned that the best way to satisfy the disagreement was to do so in Court, as per the Contract.

However, during the latter discussion Victor blatantly lied stating that '..in our meetings I did ask whether you wanted a roadmap, but you said it was not needed.' Logically this made no sense - why would anyone not want to know where £4,000 monthly project development costs were being spent, or the Project progressing? This false statement was subsequently repeated a couple of times.

This put a completely different perspective on things, and made me question CodeLeap's integrity as well as why:

- a roadmap/plan was never provided
- my requests to focus on certain areas were consistently ignored
-no follow-up notes were made to meetings
etc - in fact, the complete opposite to how the earlier app work was performed.

Of course, the above is from my perspective only, and Victor has his side - for example he vaguely stated that my development requests were not clear (despite being stated verbally and in writing numerous times)- well, if they were not clear, 1. why were they not questioned 2. why were they worked on regardless, and 3. why was a dev plan not provided for clarity?

I asked CodeLeap to remove my referral from their site but they continue to place it, hence this review.

I have also noted that CodeLeap's Ltd Co address is a virtual office, making it difficult (but not impossible) to submit legal documents/action.

In his reply to this review I note that Victor stated 'we approached both phases with the same care and process that had worked so well before' which unfortunately is 100% incorrect - unlike the 1st (app) phase, the 2nd (website) phase had no roadmap, beta site (for constant review), development plan, meetings follow-ups, etc. In response to how it's a shame how the relationship ended, when there's no integrity or trust, that shouldn't be a surprise.

There was one silver lining - I found another Brazilian co to complete the work, who charge me £200 per day (more in line with offshore development rates) that I'm happy with

22 July 2025
Unprompted review
Codeleap logo

Reply from Codeleap

Thanks, Edwin. It's a real shame this is how a multi-year working relationship ended. The earlier phase of the work went well — that's reflected in your own review — and it's genuinely disappointing that the later phase didn't, especially given we approached both phases with the same care and process that had worked so well before. We tried in good faith to work through the concerns when they arose, but weren't able to reach a resolution together. We won't debate the specifics here.

For anyone reading this while considering CodeLeap: we've been building software for founders and businesses since 2019. We take pride in how we plan, communicate, and deliver — and in how we handle things when disagreements come up. If this review gives you pause, please get in touch. We'd be happy to walk you through how we work, share references from current clients, and answer anything you'd like to know.

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look