While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Review summary

Created with AI, based on recent reviews

Evaluating 134 reviews, most reviewers were let down by their experience overall. Many people found the platform to be a highly toxic environment, characterized by cyberbullying and the presence of offensive content. Reviewers frequently reported issues with censorship and a lack of free speech, where opinions not aligning with certain narratives led to bans or content removal. The moderation system was often criticized for being biased, inconsistent, and leading to shadow bans or account closures without clear reasons. Customers also experienced significant difficulties with the website's functionality, including slow performance, numerous ads, and problems with navigation and basic actions. Many found it challenging to manage their accounts, with reports of server errors, posts disappearing, and basic actions failing, making it hard to even leave the platform. However, some people mentioned that despite these issues, the platform still offers a space for in-depth discussions and allows communities to set their own standards, which they appreciate.

What people talk about most

Social media

Clients share negative opinions on social media, with many reviewers expressing significant dissatisfaction... See more

Website

Reviewers highlight significant dissatisfaction with the website, noting that it no longer feels like the... See more

User experience

Customers consistently note negative experiences with user experience, describing the platform as... See more

Staff

People report negative experiences with staff, with many reviewers describing community managers and... See more

Service

Reviewers mention negative feedback about service, with many experiencing systematic and persistent problems.... See more

Reviews shaping this summary

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This app is total garbage. Every time I create an account it's Shadow banned within a day, even when I don't post anything or comment on anything. I have never posted anything religious, offensive or... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit cherrypicks posts. They claim see our "guidelines "? However, I've seen many derogatory comments on there. I deleted my account because of their bias, and discriminatory practices. Some of th... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The most toxic place on the net. The Australian subs are poisonous. Narratives controlled by the mods who ban anyone with a different opinion. Yet they allow those who agree with them to tell you... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I've literally seen r*dditors tell their opposition to kill them selves. (spoiler alert the opposition is right wing) What did the "opposition" do? literally nothing that warrants this behavio... See more


1.2

Bad

TrustScore 1 out of 5

817 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

1.2

All reviews

(817)

181 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Two-Sentence Template Rejection of Comprehensive Legal Complaint

On February 12, 2026, we filed six formal complaints with Reddit through every available channel — Moderator Code of Conduct, Community Harassment, Trademark, and UK Online Safety Act. We submitted a 14-page formal complaint, US trademark certificates, and documentation of 35+ enforcement actions across 16+ platforms proving $770,000+ in harm caused by two moderators of r/BlytheDolls who have run a coordinated defamation campaign for 46 months.

One moderator personally owns an attack website and uses her Reddit mod privileges to promote it while deleting positive content and rejecting reports against herself. The site publishes home addresses where children live. She admits on her own site she cannot prove her accusations yet publishes false criminal allegations against a business with zero criminal record in 26 years of operation.

Every other platform reviewed the same evidence and acted. Medium SUSPENDED the operator's account. Google REMOVED her URLs. Sitejabber REMOVED her entire listing. A blog host confirmed her content was defamatory and took it down. 35+ actions across 16+ platforms — every single one acted.

Reddit responded seven hours later with two sentences: "We are unable to determine that the content violates local law." No analysis of our evidence. No review of moderator abuse. No acknowledgment of the trademark infringement or children's addresses being published. A template rejection without reading the complaint.

We are established since 2000, serve 100,000+ customers in 150+ countries, featured by Forbes, BBC, The Guardian and Vogue Italia, Trustpilot 4.8/5, Etsy Star Seller. Three customers directly cited these Reddit threads when filing chargebacks, causing permanent PayPal deactivation and Stripe account closure.

Reddit has an F rating on the BBB with 200+ unanswered complaints. This is not a failure — it is policy. They do not review complaints. Businesses targeted by moderator abuse have no recourse. We have escalated to Ofcom, the UK ICO, the FTC, the California Attorney General, and the BBB. Legal proceedings are being prepared.

12 February 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Can’t Post Genuinely Because of Cocky Mods

Tried to share a genuinely useful tool for Colombo Stock Exchange dividends, and the cocky mods (with a whopping -52 karma, by the way) deleted it faster than you can say “rupee crash.” These folks treat helpful content like a crime scene — overzealous, power-tripping, and allergic to anything that might actually benefit the community.

Friendly? Nope. Reasonable? Haha, don’t make me laugh. Efficient? Only at flexing their ban hammer.

If you want your posts nuked for no reason and your karma permanently traumatized, welcome to r/srilanka. Otherwise, avoid like a bad investment.

29 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This website needs taking down.

The overreaching censorship, the warnings of you breaking rules that you didn't break, the social credit score voting system, Reddit is literally contributing to the social degradation of our society, and it needs to be taken down. Very few social media has caused the level of harm this platform does.

21 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit should pay but not ban

I suppose Reddit should pay for useful comments but not ban permanently each and everyone without even detailed explanation!

I had already 6.1k karma, 2.1k contributions, 35 achievements, more than 1 year on Reddit.

Nothing matters!
Moderators don't have any respect to the subscribers. You can be banned without explanation. Need to waste your time to find out what the reason was, maybe it was just because you used VPN or moderator had bad mood!

After you report some spam, nudity, hate comments/posts you can be banned also 😳

.. write to customer service which is absolutely not helpful, probably it's AI support, everything is robotic.

When you create a new account, you can't write comments the first 3 months!!!! What on Earth rules are these?!
They deleted my comment explaining that I'm a new user, less than 3 months account 🙄

There are many talented, skillful specialists who share very valuable information, their vision, time, experience which usually cost money!

Reddit has community awards for high-value comments, engagement, karma, etc. but it doesn't have any value!

Reddit is a big disappointment for me, wasting of time and energy.

u/annkorphoto

I deleted all my accounts and not going to use reddit again.

13 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit appears to be a place that has an agenda to promote and will ban opposing views.

Reddit appears to be a place that while claiming a reasonable amount of free speech is anything but. There is obviously an agenda being persued on Reddit and any contrary lines of discussion are not tolerated. There is no consistency with how people are treated. Some are free to peddle any view they want while others are banned for just questioning those views. Foul language from some is fine while for others its not. It appears that the platform content is judged not by a overall policy but on a personal level by moderators who wish to display their views through the control of content.

6 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit is very toxic 🥀💔

Reddit is very toxic bro. Come on Reddit, your social media is extremly toxic cuz one time I got scammed in a roblox game. A lot of people was making fun of me, but not just any common bully. It's a very high tier cyberbullying because after that, he called me a 7yr and a random person called me a little kid and then I tried to confront, instead I get cooked and getting roasted by toxic. Like lmao bro, Reddit was supposed to be a community that talk about stuff and some nice tips, not toxic bro. Come on, fix your platform.

7 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit is run by AI

Reddit is trash ran by lazy mods and 99% by AI. They will ban every single account you have if you accidentally post on a subreddit that banned you over a joke. Even if you comment with an account that wasn’t banned, and it was an accident because despite hiding this subreddit, it keeps entering your feed. I sincerely hope the company dies a quick death and is replaced by something ethical. The app is overrun by scams, threats, and harassment and they don’t bother to stop it or moderate it .

1 January 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Reddit claims to support open…

Reddit claims to support open discussion, but my experience shows that serious, real-world concerns are routinely silenced—especially when they involve police accountability in Canada. Public reviews of police services have already been disabled on Google, and when users try to raise similar issues on Reddit, posts are often removed by moderators. I attempted to share concerns about how people can access information about police misconduct when all major platforms restrict or erase those conversations, and my post was repeatedly taken down. This creates a closed loop where the public is told oversight matters, but the tools to discuss it are systematically removed.

What makes this especially troubling is that my post was not abstract or theoretical. It was based on my own lived experience involving extensive police surveillance, the disclosure of deeply personal and sensitive information to a family member, and the long-term consequences that followed. These are the kinds of experiences people need to be able to talk about—carefully, respectfully, and fact-based—so others understand how policing powers affect real lives. Yet Reddit’s moderation culture seems to treat any detailed, critical discussion of police conduct as inherently unacceptable, regardless of tone or relevance, leaving no meaningful space for survivors or complainants to be heard.

By removing posts like mine, Reddit contributes to a larger problem: when Google disables reviews and Reddit deletes discussions, the public is left with no way to learn from others’ experiences with law enforcement. This isn’t about harassment or hate; it’s about transparency, accountability, and public interest. Reddit could choose to allow well-moderated, experience-based discussions on policing instead of defaulting to censorship. Until it does, its reputation as a platform for honest and open dialogue—especially on difficult but important topics—rings hollow. many honest and respectfully written posts about negative encounters with police are removed by moderators, often without clear explanations.

This pattern creates the impression that certain topics are effectively off-limits, even when they are discussed in a factual, non-abusive way. While moderators and platforms have the right to enforce rules, the broad removal of posts about police misconduct feels less like moderation and more like silencing. Reddit’s decentralized moderation system means that entire communities can shut down important conversations, leaving users with no consistent or transparent way to share real experiences that affect public trust.

When major platforms like Google and Reddit both restrict or remove public feedback about policing, it raises an important question: how are people supposed to learn about others’ experiences with law enforcement? In Canada, where public oversight and accountability matter, removing these discussions limits awareness rather than protecting users. Reddit could do better by allowing carefully worded, experience-based discussions on this topic instead of defaulting to takedowns that undermine its reputation as a place for open and meaningful dialogue.

31 December 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Disgusting communist style platform…

Disgusting communist style platform where you're not allowed to post anything about anything at all because [insert vague excuse here]. Reddit should be banned from the internet. It has no place in a free western society.

28 December 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Fairly incompetent, mods and admins obfuscate, ban then clutch pearls rather than explain specifically

Fairly incompetent, jannies with a stick up their ass. You ask for your comment to be approved? In a default subreddit? Get banned permanently while the jannie with a stick up their ass reports you to reddit admins, which are just jannies with an even bigger stick up their ass. They'll then give you a 3 day site wide ban for daring ask their favored moderator to stop censoring discussions without a reason. IDGAF what colloquial term I call them, moderator, mods, janitors, jannies. That wasn't offensive, nor was offense intended. I'm intending offense here, because calling them "jannies" obviously got under their skin. I never intended that offense, but I'm from the old Internet where people discuss things, permabans are reserved for spammers/actual abuse, not a nickname for janitor.

I thought the information on the website is useful, but if reddit admins are gonna ban everyone for using old terminology, it's just censorship and authoritarianism under a different name. Don't expect to get your comments that are shadow removed approved, nor dare ask a jannie to approve it. The mods and admins would rather issue you template responses instead of actually addressing the substance of the matter. Or act "offended" while they mute you for 28 days so you can't even respond. It's bullshit, it's no way to treat a userbase. I've never received an apology nor even consideration from these jannies. L. Garbage experience.

EDIT: I've dropped it down to 1/5. Apparently, reddit considers it harassment to ask for an official response from mods. In a ban appeal. Yeah, right. A mute stick isn't a response, jack ass.

14 December 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Bad!

Reddit is really sad both quality wise and in their direction of moderation. Shame as they have a nice platform otherwise..!!

20 December 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

If you're a newbie, step aside and get shadowbanned

The platform itself seemed quite friendly to me at first. I used network for about a month, rarely engaging in discussions.

The other day, I stumbled upon a group for trading/selling in-game items for a certain interesting for me game between players and posted 'I want to buy'-offer for a specific item.
About 15 hours later, I posted another buy-offer for another item, but the post was automatically blocked by the subreddit - as it later turned out, the subreddit's rules don't allow more than one buy/sell offer to be posted in 20 hours.

I received a warning from the subreddit, but a couple of minutes later, I discovered that Reddit itself had shadowbanned me.
Before I even realized what was happening, I managed to ask a subreddit moderator to unban me, but was told I had no restrictions and that Reddit gave me shadowban.

Reddit won't send you a shadowban notification by email, so you'll have to spend your time figuring out what happened.
The official position is that this is done to combat spammers and bots, but ultimately, a HUGE portion of new users are being targeted.

I filed an appeal against the ban, and I read that moderators can take anywhere from A FEW DAYS TO MONTHS to review it.

This is unacceptable. I don't intend to waste my nerves on a long wait. A reasonable time frame for reviewing such cases should be up to several hours. Although that's still too much.

I'm ending my work with this platform, and given Reddit's complete disinterest in new users, I don't recommend using the network.

The disregard for users is exactly what Reddit deserves from users as well.

17 December 2025
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look