While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

Review summary

Created with AI, based on recent reviews

Evaluating 431 reviews, most reviewers were let down by their experience overall. Consumers frequently complain about increasingly expensive subscription costs and rising license fees that simply do not match the poor quality of programming provided to the public. Many individuals also encounter frustrating technical issues and annoying obstacles when trying to access online streaming media, mobile apps, and official websites. Some reviewers were surprisingly satisfied with specific quality dramas and found certain television presenters to be genuinely fantastic, respectful, and engaging. Some people also felt that the remarkably wide range of available programming successfully offered great balance and made the overall subscription cost worthwhile.

What people talk about most

Staff

Customers had negative experiences with staff, frequently complaining about poor presentation,... See more

Service

People report negative experiences with service, expressing frustration over what they describe as... See more

Product

Clients share negative opinions on product, describing programming and content as outdated, uninspiring, and... See more

Website

Consumers find website to be negative, highlighting a strong consensus on various site issues. Reviewers... See more

Price

Reviewers mention negative feedback about price, frequently describing the annual licence fee as poor value... See more

Reviews shaping this summary

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

We have just had to get a new freesat box - annoying and expensive in itself. It promised an app but for some reason that has been terminated. Instead we have to use the remote to enter a password w... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

£170 TV licence in the UK. I'm on holiday in Majorca and I'm now expected to pay an annual subscription fee in US dollars. Just to read the news on the BBC'S website. Absolute rip off.

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Unable to watch the cup final live and a recording failed, I waited up until after midnight to see the highlights. I avoided watching tv and on line, to avoid learning the result. I turned on the BBC... See more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Bbc nbreakfast is fine with the news readers and their all lovely EXCEPT NAGA MANCHETTY WHY IS SHE BACK on thought she was leaving. That completely ruins the news with her nasty sarcastic attitude. It... See more


1.3

Bad

TrustScore 1.5 out of 5

9K reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

No history of asking for reviews

This company hasn't invited their customers, so reviews may not be representative

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

1.3

All reviews

(9,419)

413 reviews in the last 12 months

Write a review
Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 3 out of 5 stars

It's a pity that this is an unclaimed…

It's a pity that this is an unclaimed profile. I often wake up through the night and will grab my mobile and check the BBC news site. When you read the first sentence of an important, global item and, because of complete carelessness, it makes no sense; you can be sure you're on BBC's website. I've lost track of the number of times, when a formal opportunity arises online, that I've complained about this, but they carry on in their lax way. The mistakes are at best confusing, sometimes completely misleading; all because no-one checks copy properly before it's uploaded to the site. Quantity over quality; BBC's motto.

25 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Horrible Development in Journalism

Horrible decision! What was one of my go to sources for news hasrecently, and unannounced, demanded a subscription fee to view their news.
Over the last year it’s been very disappointing, and extremely concerning, to now see how content, style and the reporting standards have deteriorated within the Cown Corporation.
Had the BBC maintained their historical integrity and professional standards I would have considered paying the subscription price. However, with other quality news sources available (The Guardian for one) who, thus far, have stayed true to the profession’s principles and ethical values I will support.
After 50 years following the BBC because of the quality and access I quit. And, I cannot fathom the BBC’s quality and value slide. I guess they are using the CBC business model.

(Did someone from the US invest in the BBC?)

20 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Received another letter from the BBC…

Received another letter from the BBC regarding the licensing fee. The phrase 'demanding money with menaces' springs readily to mind.
According to the BBC's own figures, "The number of TV licences in force has dropped by two million (or 8%) in five years - from 25.3 million in 2020-21 to 23.3 million in 2025-26."
It is not all evasion as there will be many people, like myself, who are actively voting with their wallet.
The BBC should be put behind a pay wall.
Update - I have just read a comment that BBC is asking its viewers to input a code. Excellent. The BBC can save a fortune by sacking everyone in its TV licensing department and the cost of sending me letters every month.

21 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I would have given a minus if I could…

I would have given a minus if I could it shouldn’t be called British Broadcasting Corporation it should be called British bullshit corporation the bbc should be defunded because all it shows is loads of repeats and absolute rubbish and they pay their presenters on tv and radio ridiculous amounts of money for basically doing nothing and that’s where your licence fee goes an absolute waste of money

20 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Sand Sculpture!

I’ve just seen a new programme advertised on BBC1 its about sand sculpture, what next Let’s watch paint dry!! No doubt there probably will be the usual ‘celebrity’ version of this I’m sure! How is this even a thing that we are paying for out of our tv licence.

Instead of paying your same old presenters (that you never change and use for all different styles of programmes ie sports presenters presenting quiz programmes) 6 figure sums why don’t you put more of our licence money into some decent dramas, like most people on here I am considering leaving the BBC it’s a joke what your charging for the rubbish you provide.

19 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

"what has the bbc ever done for me" …

"what has the bbc ever done for me" ????

apart from over charge for a service i dont even use but have to pay just to watch live tv from other service's which i also pay for

i hate the bbc for this model they use it is very outdated

18 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

BBC look north

BBC look north.
Do you realise i am 1 of millions having to pay your wages and yet you cant even spell. If your editor is so thick can someone with 1 brain sell to tell him use spell checker.
Monday night sport they were discribing the w/end matches.
The teams were shortend and
Hartlepool was shown as HPL... DUH
Everyone knows Hartlepool should be HLP....
Not good enough

17 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Just had to renew my license not…

Just had to renew my license not because I watch the BBC - I don't but because I watch live TV - mainly TNT Sports for which I have to pay a separate subscription. So I am forced to fund these grifters and their biased news coverage of Israel, Arday, etc. Why didn't BBC Verify investigate Arday's lies?!! Of course they didn't because the BBC promoted him in several short programmes.

17 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

I am absolutely livid

I am absolutely livid. I pay my license and end up with a damned QR code to get in. No wonder people are leaving in droves. I expect INSTANT access when I pay my licence and everything worked fine earlier in the day. Infuriating random blocking. They should KNOW I am a license payer. Maybe I will now cancel my direct debit like so many others and depart this awful politically correct left wing organisation for good.

16 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

You are scam

You never report anything that is positive. Just spread fake negativity to scare people. Shame on you

16 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

The BBC have completely ignored their…

The BBC have completely ignored their longwave radio 4 listeners and switched off the transmitters. Not everyone is able to receive DAB, and to totally ignore their longwave listeners and deprive them of the service is absolutely disgraceful.

15 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Too many repeats and presenters

Ridiculous running costs with far too many presenters and yet far too many repeats which is unfair given we are constantly reminded the television licence is paid by us especially when programmes filmed abroad with no significant information with us paying for their holiday 😢

15 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

What has the BBC done for us?

What has the BBC done for us?

It depends who the 'us' is. For 'celebrities' it has given many untalented people obscene amounts of 'public' (licence fee a tax like the poll tax) money.

For viewers, it generally treats viewers with contempt.

It is hard to believe that someone at the BBC thought that the 'tone deaf' 'advert for itself' was a good idea rather than an annoying waste of screen time and money.

14 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

But oh, the disappointment!

Right then, gather 'round, and let me tell you about the state of things. You'd think, wouldn't you, that after Australia, bless their cotton socks, decided they'd had enough of the Commonwealth Games, Scotland would have stepped up to the plate. And for a moment there, it felt like good news for us Brits. We had those fantastic tournaments in 2002, 2014, and then 'bostin' in 2022. Imagine Glasgow again, putting on a show, a real display of British pride.

But oh, the disappointment! No Hampden Park, no Ibrox. And loads of sports? Simply 'missing'. The whole thing was, frankly, abysmal.

Now, Birmingham. They hosted a cracking games just four years ago. So, when it was announced they'd be hosting the European Athletics Championships this year, I, a proud West Midlander, was over the moon. Excited, I was. Yes, admittedly, the stadium they picked is a bit basic. You wouldn't catch a premier league team slumming it in such a mediocre place. But 2022! It was packed.

Then comes this Monday. The shock! Some of the temporary stands? Gone. And the fans? Also gone!

Two utterly embarrassing tournaments this summer. Wimbledon's lost its sparkle, hasn't it? The Hundred cricket? Full of empty seats. And the Community Shield, for goodness sake, is in 'Cardiff', not Wembley, because some music concert is more important to the people who own our iconic stadium.

Oh yes, we know who owns it, don't we? Money-grubbing individuals who'd rather shove American football down our throats than our own game, the game of the world!

And who's covering much of this dismal sporting summer? The BBC, of course. Champions of political correctness, they must be having a field day with these new rules in athletics about women's sport. The fans? Clearly not enjoying it, judging by those empty stands!

Honestly, imagine if women's tennis started blurring out their chest areas when receiving serve! Just to be fair, you know? Because losing is so upsetting, let everyone win! No more 'earthy' language, oh no. Just plenty of 'half-time shows' like the ones we apparently enjoyed in New York last month. And elite analysts like Michael Johnson? Utterly redundant. The future is all about smiling faces spouting absolute nonsense.

It's quite something, isn't it, how in this increasingly distasteful modern sporting landscape, the 'old ways' are becoming more treasured. Compare the Isle of Man TT races with Formula 1. The 'safety car' has utterly ruined F1. Think about the British Grand Prix this summer!

Now, don't get me wrong, the BBC aren't entirely to blame for this dire sport. They didn't dream up these ridiculous guidelines for female coverage, for instance. But they just lap up the 'political coverage' when other channels have the good sense to steer clear.

And Gary Lineker. Never been a fan. His constant criticism of us Brits grates. Though, to his credit, he didn't back down when Jurgen Klopp, after that win – you know the one! – let rip. We all need to stand up to this political correctness. If the BBC won't, then frankly, enjoy your retirement, Auntie. And the money we save could be put to much, much better use.

10 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Watching the european athletics

Watching the european athletics, well i say watching the sport just listen to Gaby chat to her mates Logan chat for 45mins and counting. Wonder why shes called gaby?Bbc have really lost the plot for covering live sport these days. All because no brits involved should not come into it. I much rather watch any athletics than listen to these boring people talking what might happen. Just show it and we will see for ourselves. Glad not get the commonwealth games as doubt see much of it anyway.

13 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

BBC bias

The BBC invites comments upon very BBC-selected news items but then uses mysterious rules to block posts until some very simple edits are done. This is not free speech as such posts are not offensive in original form! It is just some curious BBC bias by moderators. As BBC keeps reminding us on their TV channels, we the public pay for the BBC but the BBC seems to limit our input. BBC are their own worst enemy when it comes to some political parties seeking to change their financing. Update: BBC fending off all comments by requiring email verification within a short timescale and if you miss their email request then a review goes nowhere. That is not a conversation just a crude filter.

13 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

Excellent

The BBC Sounds app is a vital part of my day. There's such a great range of drama, comedy, factual and music, that I can always find something to suit my mood and interests. So useful to be able to subscribe to series and get notifications of when new episodes appear as well.

10 August 2026
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Poor value for money

7 hours of cricket on BBC 2 today and BBC 1 mostly repeats. This is not value for money. Perhaps if they didn’t pay staff 6 figure sums to play records on the radio they might be able to afford to produce some new programmes.

9 August 2026
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look