Sparxunderwear Reviews 12

TrustScore 2 out of 5

2.1

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more

2.1

Poor

TrustScore 2 out of 5

12 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Does not keep the promise

Bought 5 from the sweat series. Price was around 100 bucks fine for what it promised. But it wont stop you from having sweat marks while going to the gym. Also if you wear are wearing trousers that are slim the shape of the underwear around the genitals makes it stuck out way to much. Feels a little to exposed... pretty unsatisfied with the results of this order...

18 August 2025
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Maths

Sparxmaths is bad and if this is in anyway related or not then change the name

6 January 2024
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Rip Off!!!!!!!

I ordered 7 pairs of underwear for my husband on 25/11/23 and after 3 emails to find out where they are, haven't received any response. Are these people for real? Taking money, not giving any response and not even sending out the underwear? What the hell???????? These are expensive underwear......Never never again..........DON'T BUY FROM THIS COMPANY

11 December 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

AVOID THIS COMPANY

Absolutely horrible customer service, they straight up just ignore you or make up any reason to avoid honoring their returns policy.

They lied about receiving the return I made and then just refused to refund my money. Their "offer" was a voucher for 20% off one pair of underwear.... They still owe me over $120

21 November 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

i dunno if this is associated with…

i dunno if this is associated with sparx maths but if it is... THAT WEBSITE STRAIGHT UP CAUSED ME TO COMMINT ARSON, TAX FRAUD, MAN SLAUGHTER VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER AND PRAY TO GOD (im an atheist) TELL THE GAY ASS RAT TO STOP PLAYING THIS LIKE ITS CALL OF POOPY, DEAR LORD IF I HAVE TO USE THIS SITE AGAIN IM GOING TO BURY A FAMINLY OF ORPHANS ALIVE. but overall, this app needs to go suck a big fat weenie

6 November 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

We were worried at first but risked it…

We were worried at first but risked it for the biscuit. Hubby absolutely loves his Sparx/ vanta undies found there delivery times quick he has tried other bands and didn't like them he only wears this brand yes a little pricey but all these style underwear are around the same price. Do I recommend yes and ladies the junk in the pouch looks amazing 🤣

30 August 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 5 out of 5 stars

There may be shortcomings with regards…

There may be shortcomings with regards to the size of the pouch for your nuts but these are the most comfy undies I have ever tried. The material and build quality slap hard. Well worth the money compared to the branded ill fitting stuff you can buy from department stores

7 July 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

Worst customer service

Avoid this company.
Ordered their underwear but needed a different size. Got to keep the pair I tried on and return the rest. Returned them and over a month passed with no result. They denied receiving them. I then lodged an enquiry with Australia Post and they proved they’d been delivered. When confronted with this their support simply stopped replying. Absolute scam. Avoid.

23 March 2023
Unprompted review
Rated 1 out of 5 stars

These were the WORST underwear I ever…

These were the WORST underwear I ever brought for my husband, he did not find these comfortable and felt they made his manhood look really on display. I paid $148 and ordered these on the 8th of December and have sent 5 emails with NO reply in refunding me for these.

7 December 2022
Unprompted review
Rated 3 out of 5 stars

Would love to love them

Bought 2 pairs of Long Leg Wine Time Bamboo underwear for my partner who usually just buys generic brands.
He absolutely loved them and they looked incredible.
However, both pairs degraded; huge holes developed at the seams after only two to three months
I would love to give a 5 star review, but I can’t afford to be buying new underwear every 2-3 months because they degrade so quickly
We followed the wash care information very carefully and my partner works in healthcare so it’s not as is the product has been exposed to a crazy environment or anything
I wish they’d lasted longer. I would have signed up for a subscription for him and myself if they’d last longer

30 March 2022
Unprompted review

Is this your company?

Claim your profile to access Trustpilot’s free business tools and connect with customers.

Get free account

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look