I have been with instant funding prop firm now for two good years now I haven't experienced any issue with them though I had breached some accounts.They have disbursed 4 payouts within 24hrs without n... See more
Company replied
While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more
To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more
See what reviewers are saying
My friend had an urgent issue sitting dead in the email queue. So I jumped on live chat to get it escalated. Big mistake. For 15+ minutes, an agent named Prashanth Avirneni just recited scripts... See more
This is an absolutely useless company. All my hard work went to waste. I did everything perfectly, but they won't pay me because I violated the 2% risk rule per transaction. They closed my account. Sh... See more
Company replied
Account No : 8100027 (issue resolved on 19 June 2026 & got an fresh new 10k account as goodwill) thanks This incident had thrice time to me, even after keeping SL below 1% of IF micro account kept S... See more
Company replied
Company details
Written by the company
Instant Funding redefined prop trading by offering traders direct access to funded accounts through its signature Instant Funding model without profit targets, time limits, or daily drawdowns. By skipping challenges and evaluations, traders can start trading right away and keep up to 90% of their profits, with accounts scaling to $3.82M. This way, they can fully focus on developing their skills and reaching new heights.
Contact info
United Kingdom
- support@instantfunding.com
- instantfunding.com
Breach of guidelines
Faced unnecessary slippage
I bought an account for 5k account (onephase)and took my first trade today which was to buy gold and I set my stoploss at 40 to 50 pips, meaning my entry was approximately at 4644.33 and my SL was around 4640 but after some time without any news my trade closed at 4614, meaning in a single trade I lost 5 times of my normal loss and my account was breached. When I spoke to the support team they said that slippage depends on the market conditions…. Does this mean we don't know how slippage works. I should get a retry on my account
6 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi,
Thank you for sharing your experience, and we’re genuinely sorry to hear about the frustration caused.
We take feedback like this seriously, and it will be shared internally with the relevant team to review.
We appreciate you bringing this to our attention
Instant Funding Team
I took two trades and my account was…
I took two trades and my account was failed with no reason
Its all a scam
I'm done with this
6 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hello there,
We understand your frustration, however your account was an IF1 account. As clearly stated in our FAQ before purchase, the IF1 account is active for 24 hours from the moment the first trade is executed. Once the first trade is placed, the 24-hour countdown begins, and the account automatically closes when that period ends.
If your account has been disabled, it means the 24-hour trading window has expired in line with the product rules.
All of our accounts operate in a simulated trading environment using real-time market data, which is also explained in our FAQ.
We always recommend carefully reviewing the account specifications and rules prior to purchasing to ensure the product suits your expectations.
Instant Funding Team
Instant funding
Everything you're saying is a lie to avoid paying me what I'm owed. I trade independently, and all my trades are my own. I keep a record of every single transaction. I know perfectly well that you're lying and making up flimsy, baseless excuses. I will tell my YouTube channel's clients to avoid this fraudulent company and work with the highly reputable We Master Trade.
3 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hello Elyamani,
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We understand that situations involving account closures and declined withdrawals can be frustrating, and we appreciate the opportunity to clarify the matter.
Your account was reviewed by our risk and compliance systems after a withdrawal request was submitted. During this review, the trading activity on the account showed a strong correlation with another account’s activity. Our monitoring process analyzes multiple factors, including trading patterns, execution timing, position behavior, and overall consistency of trades across accounts. Based on this analysis, the activity was identified as matching patterns typically associated with copy trading or externally managed trading.
Under our trading rules, all accounts must be traded independently. The use of copy trading services, shared signals, automated copying tools, or third-party account management is strictly prohibited because it creates an unfair advantage and undermines the integrity of the program for other traders. For this reason, when such activity is confirmed, the account is terminated in accordance with our policies.
It is also important to clarify that the timestamp referenced in the review reflects the moment the violation was detected and confirmed by the system. The determination is not based on a single trade or one specific moment, but rather on a broader evaluation of trading behavior across the account.
We understand that this outcome may not be the one you were hoping for, but the decision was made following a full review by our risk and compliance team and is consistent with the trading rules that apply to all accounts. These rules exist to maintain a fair and transparent environment for all traders participating in the program.
For full transparency, we encourage reviewing the program guidelines available here:
https://instantfunding.com/trading-rules
We appreciate you sharing your perspective and thank you for the time you spent trading with us.
Instant Funding Support Team
Unfair Payout Rejection & Poor Support Response
I had a very disappointing experience with this prop firm regarding my payout request and account handling.
I requested a payout after successfully completing all requirements and trading for around 15 days. After that, I was asked to attend a risk interview, which I scheduled at the earliest available time. I waited 5 days for the meeting, completed it, and was told everything was fine and in order.
However, the very next day, my payout was rejected and all my accounts were marked as breached without providing any clear or verifiable evidence. The reason given was “account management,” but I want to clearly state that all trading and account activity was handled solely by me. There was no third-party involvement, no copy trading, and no account sharing.
I requested proof multiple times and even offered to go through additional verification, but no concrete evidence was provided. On top of that, I opened multiple support tickets and sent several emails, but received little to no response.
This situation caused significant inconvenience. I spent around 23 days in total (trading + waiting + delays), and as a trader, time is extremely important.
Additionally, my active accounts were also breached under the same reasoning, and despite acting in good faith, no refund or fair resolution was provided.
Based on my experience, I was not provided with any authentic or verifiable reason for these actions, which raises serious concerns about transparency and fairness.
I would advise other traders to proceed with caution and carefully evaluate their experience before committing to this firm.
I am still open to a fair resolution and hope the company will reconsider and handle this matter professionally. Dear Support Team,
Thank you for your response.
I would like to clarify that I have fully cooperated with your company throughout the entire process, including attending the risk interview and being available for any additional verification or meeting if required.
However, despite your claims, I have not been provided with any concrete proof or verifiable evidence that my account was managed by any other person. I clearly state that all trading activities and account management were conducted solely by me.
If your company believes otherwise, I kindly request that you provide specific evidence, such as proof of copy trading, IP mismatch, account sharing, or any third-party involvement. I am fully prepared to review and respond to any such evidence.
At this stage, if your company does not wish to continue working with me and is unable to process my payout, I respectfully request a full refund of the payments made for my active accounts. To the best of my knowledge, I have not violated any rules.
If no evidence is provided and the payout cannot be processed, I would prefer to discontinue my relationship with your firm and continue my trading journey elsewhere.
I request that this matter be handled fairly and professionally. I look forward to your response.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
2 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hello Menna,
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand that situations involving payout reviews and account restrictions can be frustrating, and we appreciate the opportunity to clarify what occurred.
As part of our standard compliance process, your account was selected for additional verification by our Risk Team prior to payout processing. This process includes a risk interview, which you attended. Following that interview and a review of the information provided, the Risk Team determined that the trading activity on the account did not sufficiently demonstrate that the account was being managed independently by you. Based on this assessment, the accounts were closed in accordance with our policies.
Please note that all relevant information and explanations regarding this decision were shared with you during the review process. The outcome was based on the findings of the Risk Team after evaluating the trading behavior and the responses provided during the interview.
Instant Funding’s requirement for additional verification, including a risk interview where applicable, is clearly outlined in our Terms and Conditions under Clause 12: Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) and Risk Team Verification. This clause allows our team to request further verification at any stage of the account lifecycle, including during payout reviews, to ensure trading activity is legitimate and compliant with our risk framework.
In simple terms, this clause allows us to:
• Request additional verification when required to ensure compliance and account integrity.
• Conduct a risk interview to confirm trader identity, verify KYC/AML compliance, and ensure understanding and adherence to trading rules.
• Review trading behavior where unusual or suspicious patterns are identified.
• Request supporting documentation or explanations related to trading activity when necessary.
• Suspend payouts or exclude trading results if the verification process is not successfully completed.
These measures are not intended to create obstacles but to maintain a fair, transparent, and compliant trading environment for all traders on the platform. The same verification standards apply equally to all accounts when additional clarification is required.
After the completion of the review and interview, the Risk Team confirmed that the account activity did not meet the required verification standards, and therefore the accounts were closed in line with the Terms and Conditions accepted at the time of purchase.
For transparency, you can review the full Terms and Conditions here:
https://instantfunding.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Acello-General-Terms-and-Conditions.pdf]https://instantfunding.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Acello-General-Terms-and-Conditions.pdf
While we understand this outcome may not be the one you hoped for, the review has been completed and the decision stands based on the findings of the Risk Team.
We appreciate your time with Instant Funding and thank you for sharing your perspective.
Instant Funding Support Team
Misleading Rules, Contradictory Enforcement, and Profits Withheld
🚩They Closed My Funded Account Using a Rule That Doesn’t Exist in Their Own Terms
Instant Funding closed my funded account and withheld my profits using a rule that is not clearly defined, not consistently applied, and contradicts their own communications.
I followed the rules exactly as they were written, traded consistently, and generated profits—only to have my account closed using a definition of “risk” that is nowhere stated in their official guidelines.
What they enforce and what they publish are not the same thing, and I have the emails to prove it.
Here’s exactly what happened.
Their website states:
“Risk per Trade Idea
You may not risk more than 1% of your starting account balance at any time in one trade idea. A trade idea includes all open positions on a single instrument in the same direction (Buy or Sell). Closing and reopening a position in the same direction on the same instrument within 10 minutes is treated as the same trade idea and does not reset the limit. Exceeding this limit will result in a hard breach.”
That’s it.
There is no definition of how “risk” is calculated. No mention of:
* stop-loss distance
* entry-to-stop calculations
* lot size formulas
* Yet when they closed my account, they told me:
“Dear Trader,
I’m reaching out regarding some recent findings on your account (can't say due to guidelines). Our monitoring system has detected a serious breach of our Gambling and Over-Leveraging Rule, specifically the 1% risk/loss per trade threshold, which applies to funded accounts.
As outlined in our trading guidelines:
"You may not risk more than 1% of your account balance on a single trade idea. A trade idea includes all open positions on a single instrument in the same direction (Buy or Sell). Exceeding this limit is classified as gambling and will result in a hard breach.”
Please note that risk is calculated as the distance between Entry and Stop Loss (Entry–SL).
If your Stop Loss risk exceeds 1% of your starting balance, it is also considered a violation of this rule.
These rules are in place to ensure a fair and responsible trading environment. You can review the full details of this policy here”
Calling stop-loss risk “also considered” a violation proves it is not the defined rule, but an added interpretation applied during enforcement.
If this were truly the rule, it would be clearly written—not introduced after the fact.
🚩 The Core Problem
There are two completely different versions of the rule:
* The website version → vague 1% limit
* The enforced version → hidden stop-loss formula
You cannot enforce a rule using a definition that is not written anywhere in the actual rule.
🚩Stop-Loss Contradiction (This is where it really falls apart)
They later sent an email on March 20th, 2026:
“All trades must have a Stop Loss set within 60 seconds… this rule has been introduced…” (temporary measure)
Let’s be clear:
If risk has always been based on stop-loss distance, then:
why were stop losses not always required?
why was this introduced later?
and why was it temporary?
That completely destroys their claim that the rule was “consistent.”
Even worse:
* The email never said stop-loss distance must stay within 1%
* It never said stop-loss placement determines a hard breach
So traders were told to use stop losses—but not how they would be used to fail you.
🚩 “Hard Breach” That Wasn’t Immediate
They claim this is an instant hard breach.
Reality:
* I continued trading
* I was only told at the payout stage
Their explanation:
“The breach was recorded in real time in the backend…”
That’s meaningless.
If the trader has no visibility, it is not real-time enforcement.
It’s retroactive enforcement after profits are made.
🚩 Conflicting Definitions of Risk
They told me:
“Risk is based on stop-loss distance”
But publicly here in trust pilot, they've said:
“The 1% rule is measured on realized losses”
Those are two completely different calculations.
They are switching definitions depending on the situation.
🚩 What This Really Means
* The rule does not define how risk is calculated
* The calculation method is introduced after the fact
* A key requirement (stop loss) was added later—and temporarily
* Enforcement happens without real-time transparency
* Different explanations are used to justify the same action
And based on all of that:
* My account was closed
* My profits were denied
* And I was told the decision is “final”
🚩 Conclusion
This is not a misunderstanding.
This is a rule being:
* vaguely written
* flexibly interpreted
* and selectively enforced
You cannot follow a rule that is not clearly defined in the first place.
If you’re considering Instant Funding, understand this:
The rules you read are not necessarily the rules they enforce.
Proceed carefully.
30 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hello Daniel,
Thank you for taking the time to share such a detailed explanation of your concerns. We appreciate the effort you have put into reviewing the rule wording and outlining your perspective.
We understand that your main concern relates to how the 1% risk per trade idea rule is defined and how the calculation method was applied to your account. To clarify, the 1% rule is intended to limit the potential exposure of a trade at the moment it is opened. In practice, the only measurable way to determine this exposure in advance is by evaluating the distance between the entry price and the stop-loss level, combined with the position size. This reflects the maximum loss the trade is intended to carry at the time of execution and is therefore used by the risk monitoring system to determine whether the trade exceeds the permitted risk threshold.
Regarding the 1% Risk Restriction introduced on March 30, the purpose of that update was to strengthen risk management practices during periods of heightened market volatility. The rule did not redefine how risk is calculated; rather, it ensured that trades have a clearly defined risk parameter in place shortly after entry. This helps both the trader and the risk monitoring system identify the intended maximum exposure for the trade. The introduction of this requirement was therefore an additional protective measure and does not change the underlying logic of how potential trade risk is evaluated.
You also raised the concern that the breach notification occurred at the payout stage rather than immediately after the trade. In situations involving rule violations such as this one, the monitoring system records the breach at the moment it occurs in the backend. However, account closure and communication may follow later after the activity is reviewed and verified. This can create the impression that the rule is being applied retrospectively, but the violation itself is recorded at the time the trade exceeds the permitted threshold.
We understand that this process can be frustrating, particularly when the breach becomes visible only after trading has continued. However, after reviewing the trade records associated with your account, the risk exposure calculated at the time of entry exceeded the allowed 1% threshold for a single trade idea. Because the 1% rule is classified as a hard breach, the account closure was applied in accordance with the program’s risk management policies.
We appreciate the detailed points you raised regarding rule clarity and communication. Feedback like this is valuable, and we will ensure your comments are shared internally with the relevant teams as we continue to refine how our rules and guidelines are presented to traders.
After a full review of the trading activity and the rule framework applied, the decision regarding the account remains unchanged and we are unable to reinstate the account or adjust the outcome.
Thank you again for taking the time to present your concerns and for engaging with us throughout this review.
Instant Funding Support Team
IF have these tendency of ignoring…
IF have these tendency of ignoring issues. Emails go unanswered BUT when you address the same issues on DISCORD they immediately blacklist you and you can't post or comment...This is immoral for lack of a better word and they are riding on ignorance. I raised an issue on "add ons" why I should pay for an "add on" for 2% increment on DD then reduce the leverage to 1:8 from 1:20????? What is the rationale???? My number is
2 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi
Thank you for this feedback. What you've described is not the standard we aim for, and we are investigating this.
We cannot identify your account from your review. Please email us directly at support@instantfunding.com so I can pull your details and ensure this is resolved.
Instant Funding Team
just received my payout from 1 phase…
just received my payout from 1 phase account thanks, hope more
1 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi
Thank you for your detailed 5‑star review! We’re thrilled to hear that your experience with Instant Funding has been so positive.
We appreciate you sharing your experience. Our goal is to keep payouts fast, transparent, and consistent. When a payout is denied, it’s always tied to a rule breach that applies equally to all traders, and we encourage everyone to review the rules carefully.
Instant Funding Team
This is a scam. This company not give our payouts
IF PRO Instant Funding is not approving KYC and is experiencing payout errors. Instant Funding does not recommend or support this platform due to these issues.
2 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Muhammad,
We’re sorry to hear about your experience. Instant Funding takes KYC and identity verification very seriously to protect all traders and comply with legal regulations. Accounts that fail KYC verification cannot be processed for payouts, as this is a legal requirement to prevent identity fraud.
If you believe your verification was incorrectly rejected, we encourage you to contact our support team directly with valid documentation so the matter can be reviewed and resolved promptly.
– Instant Funding Team
please do not purchase this instant…
please do not purchase this instant funding accounts they are not giving payouts to profitable traders all the time they have new rules when you place withdrawal and new reason and they try not give payout. when i placed withdrawal for first time they do not have any problem because amount was small and when i have placed withdrawal for second time they rejected that because that amount was very big and they changes rules every now and then. please be fair to traders when it comes to payouts i have proofs of first account and second account also
1 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Rohan,
We’re sorry to hear about your experience and understand your concerns. Instant Funding applies consistent trading and payout rules across all accounts, regardless of profit size. Decisions are based strictly on rule compliance, not withdrawal amounts.
We do not change rules at the time of withdrawal, and all evaluations follow our established policies. If you believe there has been a misunderstanding, we encourage you to share your details with our support team so your case can be reviewed thoroughly.
– Instant Funding Team
This firms cares about its traders!
This firms cares about its traders!
My payout got denied couple weeks ago due to my own mistake, i was really sad because of that and distanced myself from them, today i got an email saying that they show me good will gesture by giving me a free 5k IF micro ACC!
The best part is that its even a special limited version where the consistency rule is 25% instead of 15%!
Thats huge and amazing! IF really does care about its traders🎉
1 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Emir,
Thank you for your detailed 5‑star review! We’re thrilled to hear that your experience with Instant Funding has been so positive.
We appreciate your comments. The Instant Funding model was designed to make trading more accessible while ensuring that successful traders are rewarded for their performance.
Instant Funding Team
in simple word good company if you…
in simple word good company if you follow rule you will get paid out
1 April 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi,
Thank you for your detailed 5‑star review! We’re thrilled to hear that your experience with Instant Funding has been so positive.
We appreciate your trust and wish you continued success ahead.
Instant Funding Team
Unfairly payout denial
I am writing to formally dispute the rejection of my payout and the breach on my account, number 8078572.
I was informed by your team that my account was breached based on the 1.5% risk rule. I would like to clarify the specifics of the trade in question to show that no actual rule violation occurred.
While it is true that my initial stop-loss setup represented a 1.5% risk on the account, I actively managed the trade and manually closed the position at a 0.5% loss. Because I closed the trade early, the actual drawdown incurred on the account was only 0.5%. The account never experienced a 1.5% drawdown or violation on that trade.
Furthermore, your firm's rules do not state that simply setting a 1.5% risk parameter constitutes a violation, even if the trade is closed immediately without ever hitting that drawdown level. Since there was no written rule stating that setting the initial risk is an automatic hard breach regardless of the actual loss, it is unreasonable to penalize my account for it after the fact.
I expect my account to be restored and my payout processed promptly.
Best regards,
Nadeem ahmad
31 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Nadeem,
Thank you for sharing your concerns. We understand your perspective regarding trade management; however, risk rules are evaluated based on the maximum exposure during the trade, not only the final realized loss.
Setting a position that exceeds the defined risk threshold can still constitute a breach, even if the trade is closed earlier. This approach ensures consistency and fairness across all accounts.
If you would like a detailed breakdown of your trade, we encourage you to contact our support team so your case can be reviewed and explained further.
– Instant Funding Team
good prop firm with good customer…
good prop firm with good customer support but there trade execution should get better
30 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Muhammad,
Thank you for your feedback! We’re glad to hear you’ve had a positive experience with our platform and customer support. We also appreciate your note on trade execution and will continue working to improve performance for our traders.
– Instant Funding Team
Dear Instant Funding Team,
Dear Instant Funding Team,
Thank you for finally responding. However, your reply raises more questions than it answers:
1. You claim 'refunds and payouts go through different verification processes' — but this is not documented ANYWHERE on your website. Your FAQ has zero mention of AML policies, wallet verification processes, or any distinction between refund and payout wallet checks. You cannot apply undocumented policies to penalize traders.
2. You acknowledged the USDT/USDC error and the '5 star' response mistake — yet offered no apology or compensation for these clear errors.
3. You say 'continue working with our support team' — I have been doing exactly that for weeks. My support ticket was closed without resolution. Every email received only '24-48 hour' delay responses.
4. My dashboard clearly shows NO BREACHES FOUND and NO CHALLENGES FOUND — I violated zero trading rules. My account was cancelled purely over an undocumented wallet policy.
5. You deleted my Order 2545163 from my dashboard — I have the original email proof.
If you genuinely want to resolve this — process my earned payout of $688.46. Everything else is just words.
Muhammad Tayyab — Account ID: 8082453
UPDATE March 30: InstantFunding's risk team is now reviewing my case after over a week of delays. Still awaiting concrete resolution on my $688.46 payout. Will update when resolved.
30 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Dear Muhammad,
Thank you for your detailed message and for your patience while we completed a full review of your account.
Following a comprehensive investigation by our Risk and Compliance team, we identified that the wallet address associated with your account has been linked to multiple users on our platform. While we acknowledge your explanation that this may have occurred as a personal favour, this creates a compliance concern from an AML and transaction monitoring perspective, as we are unable to reliably verify ownership or ensure proper separation of funds.
Under our AML framework, we are required to ensure clear ownership and traceability of all transactions. When a wallet is associated with more than one user, it introduces account linkage risk and prevents us from confirming that funds are not being shared or routed between accounts. For this reason, such wallets are not eligible to receive profit payouts, regardless of intent. Please review here
Regarding your concern about the refund being sent to the same address, there is no contradiction in this process.
A refund and a profit payout are treated differently from a compliance perspective. Refunds are processed based on the details provided by the customer for the return of funds, whereas profit payouts are subject to stricter verification requirements, including ownership validation and AML risk controls. In your case, the refund was processed to the wallet address you provided for that purpose. This does not constitute validation of the wallet for payout eligibility.
We would also like to clarify a technical point regarding your statement about USDT and USDC wallets. The address you provided is an Ethereum (ERC20) wallet address. On the Ethereum network, the same wallet address is used to receive multiple tokens, including both USDT and USDC. These are different assets operating on the same blockchain, not separate wallet addresses. As such, the refund being processed in USDC instead of USDT does not change the destination wallet, and the funds were sent to the exact same address you provided.
While wallet sharing is not listed as a standalone rule, this restriction falls under our broader compliance obligations, including AML requirements, ownership verification, and the prevention of account linkage between multiple users. These controls allow us to restrict transactions where ownership cannot be clearly verified.
Based on the outcome of this review, your payout request will not be processed, and your account has been permanently closed. This decision is final and has been made in line with our Terms & Conditions and internal compliance procedures.
We understand this may be disappointing, however these measures are necessary to maintain a secure and compliant environment for all users.
Instant Funding Team
💵Trading my funded account💵
I just requested a 4 figure payout with my funded account.
Executing is very good, rules are easy to understand.
Honestly I don't understand why lots of people are flaming this company.
My experience has been top level so far.
Will keep you guys updated about the payout process
27 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Matthias,
Thank you for sharing your experience! It’s great to hear that execution has been smooth for you and that you find the rules clear and easy to follow.
We appreciate you highlighting your journey so far, especially after requesting your payout, that’s an important milestone. Feedback like yours helps provide a balanced perspective for other traders.
We’ll be looking forward to your update on the payout process and wish you continued success in your trading journey.
— Instant Funding Team
I got my payout smoothly
I got my payout smoothly. There are lot of negative reviews but if you follow the rules then surely you will get your payout. Every rule is mentioned on thier website no hidden rules are there...had great experience ...
27 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Abhijit,
Thank you for sharing your experience! We’re glad to hear that your payout was processed smoothly and that you had a positive experience overall.
It’s great that you found the rules clear and easy to follow, staying compliant is definitely key to a smooth journey. Your feedback helps provide a helpful perspective for other traders.
Wishing you continued success in your trading!
— Instant Funding Team
Scam alert
I have used this company for over 6 months , but in this week my account was terminated, the reason was reverse trading, and their proof was someone , somewhere opened a trade in Xauusd with a 0,01 lot against my position that was 1 lot, an hour before I opened my trade and he closed the trade two hours after,
Wow I recommend to everyone that think to buy their challenge, you are wasting your money,
This company is a scam, I have screenshots and proof for everything I said,
This company is doomed to bankruptcy, Stay away at All cost , use reliable prop firms.
I wish someone will start a class action lawsuit against them
23 March 2026
Unprompted review
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi Saad,
Thank you for your message and for providing clarification regarding your trading activity.
We understand your concern about the trades being placed on different dates. However, please note that our monitoring system does not assess violations based solely on trade timing. It evaluates multiple factors, including trade patterns, positioning behavior, and correlations across accounts. In some cases, even if trades are executed on different days, patterns may still be identified as overlapping or inverse in nature.
This type of activity falls under prohibited practices as outlined in our policies. You can review the relevant sections here:
- https://instantfunding.com/help/
- https://instantfunding.com/trading-rules/
Based on our internal review, the activity detected across the accounts was consistent with reverse trading behavior, which is not permitted. As a result, the account termination decision remains in place in accordance with our terms and conditions.
We understand this may not be the outcome you were hoping for, but these measures are necessary to maintain a fair trading environment for all participants.
Thank you for your understanding.
Kind regards,
Instant Funding Support Team
Great opportunities
31 October 2025
Reply from Instant Funding
Hi,
Thank you for your 4‑star review! We’re thrilled to hear that your experience with Instant Funding has been so positive.
We appreciate your trust and wish you continued success ahead.
Instant Funding Team
The Trustpilot Experience
Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.
Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.
Learn more about other kinds of reviews.
We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.
Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.
Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.
Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.
Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.